방법 비교
선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.
| Valuation Studies Method× | Digital Methods× | |
|---|---|---|
| 분야 | Science Technology Studies | Science Technology Studies |
| 계열 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 기원 연도 | 2013 | 2013 |
| 창시자≠ | Claes-Fredrik Helgesson, Fabian Muniesa, Michèle Lamont | Richard Rogers, Amsterdam Digital Methods Initiative |
| 유형≠ | Practice-oriented method for studying valuation | Empirical research approach for online data |
| 원전≠ | Helgesson, C.-F., & Muniesa, F. (2013). For what it's worth: an introduction to valuation studies. Valuation Studies, 1(1), 1-10. DOI ↗ | Rogers, R. (2013). Digital Methods. MIT Press. ISBN: 9780262018838 |
| 별칭 | Sociology of valuation, Valography, Study of evaluation practices | Follow the medium, Natively digital research, Web epistemology methods |
| 관련 | 4 | 4 |
| 요약≠ | The valuation studies method treats valuation—the production, measurement, ordering, and contestation of worth—as a social practice to be studied empirically rather than a hidden mental act or a settled economic fact. Consolidated by Claes-Fredrik Helgesson and Fabian Muniesa and complemented by Michèle Lamont's comparative sociology of valuation and evaluation, it follows how rankings, metrics, prices, and evaluation procedures actually do their work, and asks how worth comes to be, by whom, with which devices, and to what effect. | Digital methods is an empirical research approach, developed by Richard Rogers and the Amsterdam Digital Methods Initiative, that takes the methods of online platforms and devices—the link, the like, the hashtag, the search engine ranking—and repurposes them for social and cultural research. Its guiding maxim is to 'follow the medium': rather than importing offline methods like the survey onto the web, the analyst learns what the medium already counts, ranks, and recommends, and turns those native operations into research instruments. |
| ScholarGate데이터셋 ↗ |
|
|