방법 비교
선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.
| UTA*× | 기준 영향 측정 시스템× | |
|---|---|---|
| 분야 | 의사결정 | 의사결정 |
| 계열 | MCDM | MCDM |
| 기원 연도≠ | 1985 | 2025 |
| 창시자≠ | Siskos, Y., Yannacopoulos, D. | Bošković, S., Jovčić, S., Simić, V., Švadlenka, L., Dobrodolac, M., Bacanin, N. |
| 유형≠ | Additive utility disaggregation — LP from ordinal reference judgements | Impact-based weighted scoring (criterion-level deviation analysis) |
| 원전≠ | Siskos, Y., Yannacopoulos, D. (1985). UTASTAR: An ordinal regression method for building additive value functions. Investigación Operativa link ↗ | Bošković, S., Jovčić, S., Simić, V., Švadlenka, L., Dobrodolac, M., Bacanin, N. (2025). A New Criteria Importance Assessment (CIMAS) Method in Multi-Criteria Group Decision-Making: Criteria Evaluation for Supplier Selection. FACTA UNIVERSITATIS — Series: Mechanical Engineering DOI ↗ |
| 별칭 | — | — |
| 관련 | 8 | 8 |
| 요약≠ | UTASTAR (UTA* — Additive utility disaggregation from reference ranking (revised UTA)) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Siskos, Y., Yannacopoulos, D. in 1985. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | CIMAS (Criterion Impact MeAsurement System) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Bošković, S., Jovčić, S., Simić, V., Švadlenka, L., Dobrodolac, M., Bacanin, N. in 2025. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGate데이터셋 ↗ |
|
|