방법 비교
선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.
| 석기 도구의 사용 흔적 분석× | 계측기 중성자 활성화 분석법× | |
|---|---|---|
| 분야 | 고고학 | 고고학 |
| 계열 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 기원 연도≠ | 1980 | 1992 |
| 창시자≠ | Lawrence Keeley | Michael Glascock |
| 유형≠ | Tool function inference | Trace element sourcing |
| 원전≠ | Keeley, L. H. (1980). Experimental Determination of Stone Tool Uses. University of Chicago Press. link ↗ | Glascock, M. D. (1992). Characterization of archaeological ceramics at MURR. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, 168(2), 217-228. link ↗ |
| 별칭 | microwear, tool use analysis | INAA, neutron activation analysis |
| 관련≠ | 4 | 3 |
| 요약≠ | Use-wear analysis (also called microwear or tool-use analysis) is a method that infers the function of stone tools from microscopic wear patterns on their cutting edges and surfaces. Pioneered by Lawrence Keeley in the 1970s-1980s, this technique examines damage patterns, polishes, and edge rounding produced as tools contact different materials during use. By analyzing these wear patterns, archaeologists can determine whether a tool was used to cut plant material, meat, bone, hide, or wood—revealing detailed information about task specialization and subsistence practices in prehistoric societies. | Instrumental neutron activation analysis (INAA) measures trace element concentrations in archaeological artifacts by bombarding samples with neutrons and analyzing the resulting gamma-ray emissions. Developed as a systematic archaeological method by Michael Glascock and colleagues, INAA provides chemical fingerprints of ceramics, obsidian, and other materials that reveal sourcing and provenance. The method is non-destructive, highly sensitive, and capable of detecting 30+ elements simultaneously. |
| ScholarGate데이터셋 ↗ |
|
|