방법 비교
선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.
| 형태론적 분석× | 비교법 분석× | |
|---|---|---|
| 분야 | 현장 조사법 | 현장 조사법 |
| 계열 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 기원 연도≠ | Late 19th century (Montelius ~1885); extended broadly through 20th century | Late 19th century; formalised 1900 |
| 창시자≠ | Oscar Montelius (seriation/typology in archaeology); formalized across disciplines through 19th–20th c. comparative humanities | Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (early conceptualisation); Raymond Saleilles and Édouard Lambert (modern discipline, 1900 Paris Congress) |
| 유형≠ | Classificatory / interpretive method | Qualitative legal research method |
| 원전≠ | McKern, W. C. (1939). The Midwestern Taxonomic Method as an aid to archaeological culture study. American Antiquity, 4(4), 301–313. link ↗ | Zweigert, K., & Kötz, H. (1998). An Introduction to Comparative Law (3rd ed., T. Weir, Trans.). Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0198268598 |
| 별칭 | typology construction, artifact typology, type analysis, classificatory typology | comparative law, legal comparison, comparative jurisprudence, CLA |
| 관련 | 6 | 6 |
| 요약≠ | Typological analysis is a systematic method for grouping objects, texts, legal categories, or social phenomena into defined types based on shared attributes. Originating in archaeology and linguistics, it is now widely applied across the humanities and social sciences to impose analytical order on diverse corpora, trace historical change, and enable meaningful comparison across cases or cultures. | Comparative legal analysis is a structured research method that examines how two or more legal systems — whether national, regional, or supranational — address a common legal problem. By placing rules, doctrines, and judicial decisions side by side, researchers identify convergences, divergences, and the underlying societal, historical, and political forces that shape legal solutions. The method is foundational to law reform, harmonisation efforts, treaty drafting, and academic legal scholarship. |
| ScholarGate데이터셋 ↗ |
|
|