방법 비교
선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.
| Type-Token Ratio× | 어휘 다양성× | |
|---|---|---|
| 분야≠ | 언어학 | 텍스트 마이닝 |
| 계열 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 기원 연도≠ | 1944 | — |
| 창시자≠ | Wendell Johnson | — |
| 유형≠ | Descriptive index of lexical diversity | Text quantification / lexical richness measurement |
| 원전≠ | Johnson, W. (1944). Studies in language behavior: A program of research. Psychological Monographs, 56(2), 1–15. DOI ↗ | McCarthy, P. M. & Jarvis, S. (2010). MTLD, vocd-D, and HD-D: A validation study of sophisticated approaches to lexical diversity assessment. Behavior Research Methods, 42(2), 381-392. DOI ↗ |
| 별칭 | TTR, Type/Token Ratio, Lexical Variation Ratio | lexical richness, vocabulary richness, Sözcüksel Çeşitlilik Analizi |
| 관련≠ | 4 | 3 |
| 요약≠ | The type-token ratio (TTR) is the oldest and most widely used measure of lexical diversity: the number of distinct word types in a text divided by the total number of word tokens. A text in which few words repeat yields a TTR near 1, while a text that recycles a small vocabulary yields a TTR near 0. Despite its intuitive appeal and trivial computation, the raw ratio is severely confounded by text length, which has motivated a long line of length-correcting transformations and, ultimately, the more robust indices that have largely superseded it for serious comparison. | Lexical diversity analysis quantifies how varied the vocabulary of a text is — how rich an author's word choice is — using measures such as the type-token ratio (TTR), MTLD, vocd-D, and Yule's K. The MTLD and vocd-D measures were validated by McCarthy and Jarvis (2010), building on earlier work by Tweedie and Baayen (1998) on the stability of lexical-richness measures. |
| ScholarGate데이터셋 ↗ |
|
|