ScholarGate
어시스턴트

방법 비교

선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.

시간 분할 매핑 검토×스코핑 리뷰×
분야과학계량학과학계량학
계열Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
기원 연도2000s–2010s2005
창시자Campbell Collaboration / Gough, Oliver & ThomasHilary Arksey & Lisa O'Malley
유형Evidence synthesis with temporal segmentationEvidence synthesis review design
원전Gough, D., Oliver, S., & Thomas, J. (2012). An Introduction to Systematic Reviews. Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-1849204842Arksey, H., & O'Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. DOI ↗
별칭temporal mapping review, time-period mapping review, longitudinal evidence map, chronological mapping reviewscoping study, literature scoping, evidence mapping review, rapid evidence map
관련66
요약A time-sliced mapping review is a systematic evidence synthesis that partitions the search period into discrete temporal segments — such as five-year intervals — and constructs a separate evidence map for each slice. By comparing maps across periods, researchers can chart how topics emerge, peak, decline, or transform within a research field, producing a longitudinal picture of knowledge structure that a single-point mapping review cannot provide.A scoping review is a systematic evidence-synthesis method that maps the breadth and nature of research on a topic — identifying key concepts, evidence types, and gaps — without necessarily appraising study quality or pooling effect sizes. Developed by Arksey and O'Malley (2005) and refined by Levac and colleagues (2010), it is particularly valuable for emerging or heterogeneous fields where a full systematic review would be premature or infeasible.
ScholarGate데이터셋
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED

검색으로 이동 슬라이드 다운로드

ScholarGate방법 비교: Time-sliced Mapping review · Scoping Review. 2026-06-19에 다음에서 검색함: https://scholargate.app/ko/compare