ScholarGate
어시스턴트

방법 비교

선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.

시간 분할 계량정보 분석×공동 인용 분석×
분야과학계량학계량서지학
계열Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
기원 연도2000s–2010s (as an explicit methodological variant)1973
창시자Derived from classical bibliometrics (Price, Garfield); explicitly formalised in longitudinal studies by Zhao & Strotmann (2008) and othersHenry Small
유형Quantitative scientometric analysisMethod
원전Zhao, D., & Strotmann, A. (2008). Evolution of research activities and intellectual influences in information science 1996–2005: Introducing author bibliographic-coupling analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(13), 2070–2086. DOI ↗Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265–269. DOI ↗
별칭longitudinal bibliometrics, temporal bibliometric analysis, diachronic bibliometrics, time-window bibliometric analysisco-citation mapping, historiograph, direct citation, citation pair analysis
관련65
요약Time-sliced bibliometric analysis partitions a literature corpus into consecutive time windows and applies standard bibliometric indicators (publication counts, citation patterns, co-authorship networks, keyword frequencies) within each window. By comparing results across slices, researchers can document how a field's productivity, intellectual structure, and thematic focus have shifted over time — providing a diachronic rather than static view of scholarly output.Co-citation analysis is a method that identifies the intellectual structure of a research domain by examining how frequently pairs of documents are cited together in other publications. When two papers are frequently cited together in the literature, they are considered co-cited, indicating they are conceptually related or influential within the same research community. Developed by Henry Small in 1973, co-citation analysis maps the 'invisible colleges' of science—networks of researchers working on related problems—and reveals how knowledge domains evolve over time.
ScholarGate데이터셋
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED

검색으로 이동 슬라이드 다운로드

ScholarGate방법 비교: Time-sliced Bibliometric Analysis · Co-Citation Analysis. 2026-06-18에 다음에서 검색함: https://scholargate.app/ko/compare