방법 비교
선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.
| System Justification Scale× | Right-Wing Authoritarianism Scale× | |
|---|---|---|
| 분야≠ | 정치심리학 | 사회심리학 |
| 계열 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 기원 연도≠ | 1994 | 1981 |
| 창시자≠ | John T. Jost & Mahzarin R. Banaji | Bob Altemeyer |
| 유형≠ | Self-report attitude scale | Self-report Likert scale |
| 원전≠ | Jost, J. T., & Banaji, M. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33(1), 1-27. DOI ↗ | Altemeyer, B. (1981). Right-wing authoritarianism. University of Manitoba Press. link ↗ |
| 별칭≠ | SJS, General System Justification Scale, Economic System Justification Scale | RWA |
| 관련 | 4 | 4 |
| 요약≠ | The System Justification Scale operationalizes system justification theory, introduced by Jost and Banaji (1994), which holds that people are motivated to defend, bolster, and rationalize the existing social, economic, and political status quo, even when doing so runs against their personal or group interest. The general version, refined by Kay and Jost (2003), is an 8-item self-report measure on which respondents rate agreement with statements such as 'In general, the American political system operates as it should' on a 7- or 9-point Likert scale. | The Right-Wing Authoritarianism Scale (RWA) is a self-report measure developed by Bob Altemeyer in 1981 to assess individual differences in authoritarian attitudes, including submission to established authorities, adherence to conventional norms, and aggression toward those perceived to violate social conventions. The scale measures three core dimensions: authoritarian submission, authoritarian aggression, and conventionalism. It has become a cornerstone of research on authoritarianism, political attitudes, and intergroup prejudice. |
| ScholarGate데이터셋 ↗ |
|
|