ScholarGate
어시스턴트

방법 비교

선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.

Standardized Effect Size for Single-Case Research×Tau-U×
분야Social WorkSocial Work
계열Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
기원 연도20122011
창시자Larry V. Hedges, James E. Pustejovsky & William R. ShadishRichard I. Parker, Kimberly J. Vannest, John L. Davis & Stephanie B. Sauber
유형Standardized mean-difference effect size comparable to between-groups dRank-based nonoverlap effect size that can correct for baseline trend
원전Hedges, L. V., Pustejovsky, J. E., & Shadish, W. R. (2012). A standardized mean difference effect size for single case designs. Research Synthesis Methods, 3(3), 224–239. DOI ↗Parker, R. I., Vannest, K. J., Davis, J. L., & Sauber, S. B. (2011). Combining nonoverlap and trend for single-case research: Tau-U. Behavior Therapy, 42(2), 284–299. DOI ↗
별칭Single-Case d, Within-Case Standardized Mean Difference, Design-Comparable Effect Size, Single-Case Standardized Mean DifferenceTau-U Single-Case, Parker Tau-U, Kendall Tau Nonoverlap, Tau-U Effect Size
관련34
요약A standardized effect size for single-case research expresses the difference between treatment and baseline phases in standard-deviation units so that it can be placed on the same scale as the familiar between-groups Cohen's d and combined across studies in a meta-analysis. The design-comparable estimator of Hedges, Pustejovsky, and Shadish (2012) explicitly models within-case and between-case variation and applies a small-sample correction, addressing the long-standing problem that nonoverlap indices and naive single-case d statistics are not comparable to the effect sizes used in group-design research.Tau-U is a rank-based effect-size index for single-case research that combines the degree of nonoverlap between baseline and treatment phases with the trend within phases, and that can optionally subtract out any improving trend already present in the baseline. Developed by Richard Parker, Kimberly Vannest, and colleagues in 2011, it extends the Nonoverlap of All Pairs (NAP) statistic by adding a Kendall-style trend component, giving practitioners a single index that is robust to outliers, has a known sampling distribution for significance testing, and does not unfairly credit a treatment for change that the baseline was already heading toward.
ScholarGate데이터셋
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED

검색으로 이동 슬라이드 다운로드

ScholarGate방법 비교: Standardized Effect Size for Single-Case Research · Tau-U. 2026-06-24에 다음에서 검색함: https://scholargate.app/ko/compare