ScholarGate
어시스턴트

방법 비교

선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.

영적 안녕 척도×좋은 죽음 척도×
분야완화의료완화의료
계열Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
기원 연도19822009
창시자Raymond F. Paloutzian and Craig W. EllisonChing and colleagues, Hong Kong
유형Self-reportSelf-report or proxy (bereaved family)
원전Paloutzian, R. F., & Ellison, C. W. (1982). Loneliness, spiritual well-being, and the quality of life. In L. A. Peplau & D. Perlman (Eds.), Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory, research and therapy (pp. 224–237). Wiley. link ↗Ching, J. P., Cheng, Z. H., Cheung, K. C., & Leung, K. K. (2009). Development and validation of the Good Death Inventory in Hong Kong. American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine, 26(1), 56–64. link ↗
별칭SWBSGDI, Good Death
관련55
요약The Spiritual Well-Being Scale (SWBS) is a 20-item self-report measure of spiritual well-being encompassing both religious faith and existential meaning—two dimensions critical to quality of life at end-of-life. Developed by Paloutzian and Ellison in 1982, the SWBS has become a cornerstone assessment tool in palliative care, chaplaincy, and oncology to identify unmet spiritual needs, guide supportive interventions, and evaluate the impact of spiritual care programs on patient outcomes.The Good Death Inventory (GDI) is a 20-item self-report measure assessing the patient's and family's perception of whether the death was 'good'—characterized by pain control, peace, meaningful closure, preparation, maintenance of dignity, and a sense that life was lived fully. Developed by Ching and colleagues in Hong Kong in 2009, the GDI operationalizes the multidimensional concept of a 'good death' into measurable dimensions, enabling clinicians and researchers to understand what makes end-of-life care meaningful and to identify deaths marked by distress or unfinished business.
ScholarGate데이터셋
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED

검색으로 이동 슬라이드 다운로드

ScholarGate방법 비교: Spiritual Well-Being Scale · Good Death Inventory. 2026-06-20에 다음에서 검색함: https://scholargate.app/ko/compare