ScholarGate
어시스턴트

방법 비교

선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.

Speech Act Analysis×비판적 담론 분석×
분야언어학질적 방법
계열Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
기원 연도1962Late 1970s–1990s (systematised ~1979–1995)
창시자J. L. Austin and John R. Searle (analytic method derived from speech act theory)Norman Fairclough; Teun A. van Dijk; Ruth Wodak
유형Qualitative pragmatic coding of utterances for illocutionary forceQualitative research method
원전Austin, J. L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Oxford University Press. ISBN: 9780198245537Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Polity Press. link ↗
별칭Illocutionary Force Analysis, Speech Act Coding, Pragmatic Act AnalysisCDA, Critical Linguistics, Discourse-Historical Approach, Dialectical-Relational Analysis
관련46
요약Speech act analysis is the empirical, qualitative method of examining real utterances for the actions they perform — promising, requesting, apologizing, warning, declaring — rather than merely for what they describe. Building on J. L. Austin's insight that saying is doing and on John Searle's systematic taxonomy of illocutionary acts, the analyst segments discourse into utterances, identifies the illocutionary force of each, classifies it (as a representative, directive, commissive, expressive, or declaration), and notes whether the act is performed directly or indirectly. It turns the philosophy of language into a coding procedure that can be applied to conversations, written texts, and elicited data.Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) is a qualitative method that examines how language in texts and talk constructs, sustains, and challenges relations of power, ideology, and social inequality. Drawing on linguistics, social theory, and critical philosophy, CDA treats discourse not merely as communication but as social practice — a site where dominance is reproduced and where resistance can be articulated. Developed in the late twentieth century by Norman Fairclough, Teun van Dijk, and Ruth Wodak, among others, CDA is applied to political speeches, media texts, policy documents, educational materials, and institutional interactions.
ScholarGate데이터셋
  1. v1
  2. 3 출처
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED

검색으로 이동 슬라이드 다운로드

ScholarGate방법 비교: Speech Act Analysis · Critical Discourse Analysis. 2026-06-24에 다음에서 검색함: https://scholargate.app/ko/compare