방법 비교
선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.
| 준거 타당도(Nomological Validity)의 축약형 검증× | 판별 타당도× | |
|---|---|---|
| 분야 | 심리측정학 | 심리측정학 |
| 계열 | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| 기원 연도≠ | 1955 (concept); 2000 (short-form context) | 1959 |
| 창시자≠ | Cronbach & Meehl (nomological network concept); Smith et al. for short-form application | Donald T. Campbell and Donald W. Fiske |
| 유형≠ | Validity assessment technique | Validity evidence / psychometric evaluation |
| 원전≠ | Cronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗ | Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. DOI ↗ |
| 별칭 | nomological validity of abbreviated scales, short-scale construct validity, nomological network validity, abbreviated form external validity | discriminant validity evidence, divergent validity, DV, AVE-based discriminant validity |
| 관련≠ | 4 | 5 |
| 요약≠ | Short form nomological validity examines whether an abbreviated version of a psychological scale preserves the pattern of theoretically expected correlations with conceptually related and unrelated constructs. It is a cornerstone step in justifying the use of a shortened instrument in research and applied settings. | Discriminant validity is evidence that a latent construct is empirically distinct from other constructs it should differ from. Originating in Campbell and Fiske's multitrait-multimethod framework (1959), it is a core component of construct validity and a mandatory check in scale development and structural equation modeling. |
| ScholarGate데이터셋 ↗ |
|
|