방법 비교

	Self-Controlled Case Series	Case-Time-Control Design
분야	Social Epidemiology	Social Epidemiology
계열	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
기원 연도	1995	1995
창시자	C. Paddy Farrington	Samy Suissa; Sander Greenland
유형	Within-person case-only design for transient exposures and acute outcomes	Self-controlled observational design with a time-trend control series
원전	Farrington, C. P. (1995). Relative Incidence Estimation from Case Series for Vaccine Safety Evaluation. Biometrics, 51(1), 228-235.	Suissa, S. (1995). The case-time-control design. Epidemiology, 6(3), 248-253.
별칭	SCCS, Case Series Method, Within-Person Comparison Design, Farrington Method	Case-Time-Control Method, Trend-Adjusted Case-Crossover, Suissa Case-Time-Control Design, Case-Crossover with Time Controls
관련	3	4
요약	The self-controlled case series, or SCCS, is a case-only study design for estimating the association between a transient exposure and an acute event by comparing each individual's event rate during exposed time windows with their rate during unexposed time windows. Developed by Paddy Farrington in 1995 for vaccine safety evaluation, it uses data only on people who experienced the outcome, and because each person serves as their own control, it automatically eliminates all fixed within-person confounders — genetics, sex, chronic conditions, socioeconomic position — without ever measuring them. A conditional Poisson likelihood removes the individual-level baseline rate and yields a relative incidence comparing risk to control periods. Whitaker, Farrington, Spiessens and Musonda's 2006 Statistics in Medicine tutorial is the standard practical guide to fitting and interpreting the model.	The case-time-control design is a pharmacoepidemiologic study design that repairs a specific weakness of the case-crossover study: bias from a secular trend in exposure. In a case-crossover analysis each case acts as their own control, comparing exposure in a short hazard window just before the event to exposure in earlier reference windows, which automatically removes all fixed, time-invariant confounders. But if the prevalence of exposure is rising or falling over calendar time for reasons unrelated to the outcome, this within-person comparison is biased. Samy Suissa's 1995 design adds a separate control series, analyzed the same way, to estimate that pure time trend; dividing the case-crossover odds ratio by the control odds ratio cancels the trend and leaves the exposure effect. Sander Greenland's 1996 analysis clarified the assumptions: the correction works only if the controls share the same exposure trend and there is no within-subject confounder, and it can introduce new bias if those conditions fail.