방법 비교
선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.
| 스코핑 리뷰× | 체계적 문헌 고찰× | |
|---|---|---|
| 분야 | 과학계량학 | 과학계량학 |
| 계열 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 기원 연도≠ | 2005 | 1993 (Cochrane Collaboration); 2004 (Kitchenham SLR guidelines) |
| 창시자≠ | Hilary Arksey & Lisa O'Malley | Archie Cochrane (conceptual foundation); formalized by the Cochrane Collaboration (1993) and Barbara Kitchenham in software engineering (2004) |
| 유형≠ | Evidence synthesis review design | Evidence synthesis methodology |
| 원전≠ | Arksey, H., & O'Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. DOI ↗ | Kitchenham, B. (2004). Procedures for Performing Systematic Reviews. Keele University Technical Report TR/SE-0401. link ↗ |
| 별칭 | scoping study, literature scoping, evidence mapping review, rapid evidence map | SLR, systematic review, evidence synthesis review, structured literature review |
| 관련≠ | 6 | 5 |
| 요약≠ | A scoping review is a systematic evidence-synthesis method that maps the breadth and nature of research on a topic — identifying key concepts, evidence types, and gaps — without necessarily appraising study quality or pooling effect sizes. Developed by Arksey and O'Malley (2005) and refined by Levac and colleagues (2010), it is particularly valuable for emerging or heterogeneous fields where a full systematic review would be premature or infeasible. | A systematic literature review (SLR) is a structured, reproducible method for identifying, appraising, and synthesizing all relevant studies on a research question. Unlike a narrative review, it follows an explicit, pre-specified protocol — from database search strings through inclusion criteria to data extraction — so that the process is transparent, auditable, and replicable by other researchers. It is widely used in medicine, education, software engineering, and the social sciences to produce the most comprehensive possible evidence base on a topic. |
| ScholarGate데이터셋 ↗ |
|
|