ScholarGate
어시스턴트

방법 비교

선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.

SAPROF: 폭력 위험 요인 평가를 위한 구조화된 보호 요인 평가×구조화된 전문적 판단(SPJ) 프레임워크: 위험 평가를 위한 구조화된 전문적 판단×
분야법심리학법심리학
계열Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
기원 연도20122003
창시자Vivienne de Vogel, Corine de Ruiter, Yvonne Bouman, Merike de Vries RobbéStephen D. Hart, Peter R. Kropp, David R. Laws
유형Clinician-ratedClinician-Synthesized
원전de Vogel, V., de Ruiter, C., Bouman, Y., & de Vries Robbé, M. (2012). SAPROF: Structured Assessment of Protective Factors for violence risk (Version 3). Forum Educatief. link ↗Hart, S. D., Kropp, P. R., & Laws, D. R. (Eds.). (2003). Sexual deviance: Theory, assessment, and treatment. Guilford Press. link ↗
별칭SAPROF, de Vogel SAPROFSPJ, Structured Professional Judgment, SPJ Framework
관련44
요약The Structured Assessment of Protective Factors for Violence Risk (SAPROF) is a 17-item structured professional judgment tool developed by de Vogel, de Ruiter, Bouman, and colleagues (2012) to identify protective factors and strengths in individuals undergoing violence risk assessment. It complements risk assessment instruments (e.g., HCR-20v3) by systematically evaluating resilience, social support, motivation, and positive functioning—domains that mitigate violence risk and inform rehabilitation potential.The Structured Professional Judgment (SPJ) framework represents a contemporary approach to forensic risk assessment that synthesizes clinical judgment with empirical evidence of risk factors. Rather than producing a numerical score, SPJ guides clinicians through systematic evaluation of case-specific evidence to arrive at a structured, transparent categorical risk judgment. SPJ has become the preferred methodology in many forensic settings globally and underlies instruments such as the HCR-20v3 (violence risk) and sexual offender assessment protocols.
ScholarGate데이터셋
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED

검색으로 이동 슬라이드 다운로드

ScholarGate방법 비교: SAPROF · SPJ Framework. 2026-06-17에 다음에서 검색함: https://scholargate.app/ko/compare