방법 비교
선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.
| SAPROF: 폭력 위험 요인 평가를 위한 구조화된 보호 요인 평가× | 구조화된 전문적 판단(SPJ) 프레임워크: 위험 평가를 위한 구조화된 전문적 판단× | |
|---|---|---|
| 분야 | 법심리학 | 법심리학 |
| 계열 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 기원 연도≠ | 2012 | 2003 |
| 창시자≠ | Vivienne de Vogel, Corine de Ruiter, Yvonne Bouman, Merike de Vries Robbé | Stephen D. Hart, Peter R. Kropp, David R. Laws |
| 유형≠ | Clinician-rated | Clinician-Synthesized |
| 원전≠ | de Vogel, V., de Ruiter, C., Bouman, Y., & de Vries Robbé, M. (2012). SAPROF: Structured Assessment of Protective Factors for violence risk (Version 3). Forum Educatief. link ↗ | Hart, S. D., Kropp, P. R., & Laws, D. R. (Eds.). (2003). Sexual deviance: Theory, assessment, and treatment. Guilford Press. link ↗ |
| 별칭≠ | SAPROF, de Vogel SAPROF | SPJ, Structured Professional Judgment, SPJ Framework |
| 관련 | 4 | 4 |
| 요약≠ | The Structured Assessment of Protective Factors for Violence Risk (SAPROF) is a 17-item structured professional judgment tool developed by de Vogel, de Ruiter, Bouman, and colleagues (2012) to identify protective factors and strengths in individuals undergoing violence risk assessment. It complements risk assessment instruments (e.g., HCR-20v3) by systematically evaluating resilience, social support, motivation, and positive functioning—domains that mitigate violence risk and inform rehabilitation potential. | The Structured Professional Judgment (SPJ) framework represents a contemporary approach to forensic risk assessment that synthesizes clinical judgment with empirical evidence of risk factors. Rather than producing a numerical score, SPJ guides clinicians through systematic evaluation of case-specific evidence to arrive at a structured, transparent categorical risk judgment. SPJ has become the preferred methodology in many forensic settings globally and underlies instruments such as the HCR-20v3 (violence risk) and sexual offender assessment protocols. |
| ScholarGate데이터셋 ↗ |
|
|