ScholarGate
어시스턴트

방법 비교

선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.

강건 경로 분석×강건 확인적 요인 분석×
분야통계학통계학
계열Latent structureLatent structure
기원 연도19981984–1994
창시자Yuan & Bentler (robust SEM/path framework); Huber (M-estimation foundation)Satorra & Bentler (robust SE/chi-square corrections); Browne (ADF estimator)
유형Causal path modeling with robust estimationConfirmatory latent variable model with robust estimation
원전Yuan, K.-H. & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Robust mean and covariance structure analysis. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 51(1), 63–88. DOI ↗Satorra, A. & Bentler, P. M. (1994). Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. In A. von Eye & C. C. Clogg (Eds.), Latent variables analysis: Applications for developmental research (pp. 399–419). Sage. link ↗
별칭robust PA, path analysis with robust standard errors, robust causal path modeling, robust structural path modelingRobust CFA, CFA with robust standard errors, Satorra-Bentler CFA, non-normal CFA
관련66
요약Robust path analysis applies robust estimation — such as sandwich standard errors or M-estimation — to path models that specify directed causal relationships among observed variables. It preserves valid inference about path coefficients and indirect effects when data violate normality, contain outliers, or exhibit heteroscedasticity that would distort conventional standard errors.Robust confirmatory factor analysis fits a pre-specified factor structure to observed data while correcting standard errors and goodness-of-fit statistics for violations of multivariate normality. It is the preferred variant of CFA whenever Likert-type, skewed, or kurtotic indicators make the classical normal-theory estimator unreliable.
ScholarGate데이터셋
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED

검색으로 이동 슬라이드 다운로드

ScholarGate방법 비교: Robust Path Analysis · Robust Confirmatory Factor Analysis. 2026-06-15에 다음에서 검색함: https://scholargate.app/ko/compare