방법 비교
선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.
| 강건 확인적 요인 분석× | 확인적 요인 분석 (CFA)× | |
|---|---|---|
| 분야≠ | 통계학 | 심리측정학 |
| 계열 | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| 기원 연도≠ | 1984–1994 | 1969 |
| 창시자≠ | Satorra & Bentler (robust SE/chi-square corrections); Browne (ADF estimator) | Karl Gustav Jöreskog |
| 유형≠ | Confirmatory latent variable model with robust estimation | Hypothesis-testing latent variable model |
| 원전≠ | Satorra, A. & Bentler, P. M. (1994). Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. In A. von Eye & C. C. Clogg (Eds.), Latent variables analysis: Applications for developmental research (pp. 399–419). Sage. link ↗ | Jöreskog, K. G. (1969). A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 34(2), 183–202. DOI ↗ |
| 별칭 | Robust CFA, CFA with robust standard errors, Satorra-Bentler CFA, non-normal CFA | CFA, confirmatory FA, measurement model, restricted factor analysis |
| 관련≠ | 6 | 4 |
| 요약≠ | Robust confirmatory factor analysis fits a pre-specified factor structure to observed data while correcting standard errors and goodness-of-fit statistics for violations of multivariate normality. It is the preferred variant of CFA whenever Likert-type, skewed, or kurtotic indicators make the classical normal-theory estimator unreliable. | Confirmatory factor analysis tests a researcher-specified factor structure against observed data. Unlike exploratory approaches, the researcher decides in advance which indicators load on which latent factor, and the model is evaluated by how closely the implied covariance matrix reproduces the sample covariance matrix. CFA is central to scale validation, construct validity assessment, and measurement invariance testing. |
| ScholarGate데이터셋 ↗ |
|
|