ScholarGate
어시스턴트

방법 비교

선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.

후향적 경쟁 위험 분석×Kaplan-Meier 분석×
분야역학역학
계열Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
기원 연도1978 (cause-specific); 1999 (subdistribution/Fine-Gray)1958
창시자Fine & Gray (subdistribution model); Prentice et al. (cause-specific framework)Edward L. Kaplan and Paul Meier
유형Retrospective observational survival analysisNonparametric survival estimator
원전Fine, J. P., & Gray, R. J. (1999). A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94(446), 496–509. DOI ↗Kaplan, E. L., & Meier, P. (1958). Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 53(282), 457–481. DOI ↗
별칭retrospective CRA, competing risks survival analysis (retrospective), cause-specific hazard analysis (retrospective), subdistribution hazard analysis (retrospective)KM analysis, KM estimator, product-limit estimator, Kaplan-Meier curve
관련45
요약Retrospective competing risks analysis applies competing risks methodology to historical (already-collected) time-to-event data in which subjects can experience one of several mutually exclusive endpoints. It uses the cumulative incidence function and cause-specific or subdistribution hazard models to estimate the probability of each event type while accounting for the fact that occurrence of one event permanently precludes the others. Widely used in oncology, cardiology, and transplant medicine where administrative or registry records are the data source.Kaplan-Meier (KM) analysis is a nonparametric method for estimating the survival function from time-to-event data. Introduced by Kaplan and Meier in 1958, it produces the classic step-function survival curve that shows the probability of surviving beyond each observed event time, correctly accounting for censored observations — participants who left the study or had not yet experienced the event by the end of follow-up. It is one of the most widely used techniques in clinical and epidemiological research.
ScholarGate데이터셋
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED

검색으로 이동 슬라이드 다운로드

ScholarGate방법 비교: Retrospective competing risks analysis · Kaplan-Meier Analysis. 2026-06-17에 다음에서 검색함: https://scholargate.app/ko/compare