방법 비교
선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.
| 원격 반구조화 면담× | 대면 반구조화 면담× | |
|---|---|---|
| 분야 | 조사방법론 | 조사방법론 |
| 계열 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 기원 연도≠ | Late 1990s–2000s (widespread adoption post-2020) | 1940s onward; widely codified in the 1980s–1990s |
| 창시자≠ | Adapted from classical semi-structured interviewing (Kvale, 1996); remote delivery formalised in qualitative methods literature from the late 1990s onward | Rooted in sociological interview traditions; systematised by researchers including Robert Merton and Paul Lazarsfeld (focused interview, 1940s) and later elaborated by Steinar Kvale |
| 유형 | Qualitative data collection technique | Qualitative data collection technique |
| 원전≠ | Kvale, S. (1996). InterViews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing. Sage. ISBN: 978-0803958203 | Bryman, A. (2016). Social Research Methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN: 9780198722519 |
| 별칭 | virtual semi-structured interview, online semi-structured interview, video-mediated semi-structured interview, distance semi-structured interview | in-person semi-structured interview, semi-structured personal interview, guided face-to-face interview, FFSSI |
| 관련≠ | 5 | 6 |
| 요약≠ | A remote semi-structured interview is a qualitative data collection method in which a researcher conducts a guided, flexible conversation with a participant over a distance-bridging medium — telephone, video conferencing, or voice-over-IP — using a prepared topic guide with open-ended questions while allowing natural conversational elaboration. It combines the structure and comparability of a protocol-driven approach with the depth and flexibility characteristic of qualitative inquiry, delivered without physical co-presence. | A face-to-face semi-structured interview is a qualitative data collection technique in which a researcher meets a participant in person and follows a prepared topic guide of open-ended questions while retaining the flexibility to probe, reorder, and explore emerging themes. It combines the consistency of a predetermined agenda with the depth and responsiveness of an open dialogue, making it one of the most widely used methods in qualitative and mixed-methods research across the social, health, and educational sciences. |
| ScholarGate데이터셋 ↗ |
|
|