방법 비교

	Queer Methodology	Intersectionality Analysis
분야	Gender Studies	Gender Studies
계열	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
기원 연도	2010	1989
창시자	Kath Browne, Catherine J. Nash, Jack Halberstam	Kimberlé Crenshaw
유형	Critical anti-normative research methodology	Critical qualitative analytic framework
원전	Browne, K., & Nash, C. J. (Eds.) (2010). Queer Methods and Methodologies: Intersecting Queer Theories and Social Science Research. Ashgate, Surrey. ISBN: 9780754678434	Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299.
별칭	Queer Methods, Queer Research Methodology	Intersectional Analysis, Intersectionality Framework, Intersectional Qualitative Analysis
관련	4	4
요약	Queer methodology is less a fixed technique than a critical stance toward research that disrupts taken-for-granted categories of sex, gender, and sexuality and resists the assumption that identities are stable, knowable, and countable. Articulated for the social sciences in Kath Browne and Catherine Nash's Queer Methods and Methodologies (2010) and prefigured in Jack Halberstam's notion of a 'scavenger' methodology, it asks not 'what is the right method?' but 'how does research itself reproduce normativity?' — and licenses researchers to borrow and combine methods rhizomatically in order to attend to fluidity, ambiguity, and the very production of the normal.	Intersectionality analysis is a critical qualitative framework that examines how multiple social categories — such as race, gender, class, sexuality, and disability — intersect and operate together to shape lived experience, advantage, and disadvantage. Coined by legal scholar Kimberlé Crenshaw in 1989 and 1991, it rejects single-axis analysis that treats categories one at a time, insisting instead that overlapping systems of power produce qualitatively distinct positions that cannot be understood by adding the categories separately.