방법 비교
선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.
| 양적 우선순위 혼합 방법 설계× | 다단계 혼합 방법 설계× | |
|---|---|---|
| 분야 | 연구설계 | 연구설계 |
| 계열 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 기원 연도≠ | 2003–2009 | 2007 (first edition of Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research) |
| 창시자≠ | Creswell & Plano Clark; Teddlie & Tashakkori | John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark |
| 유형 | Mixed methods research design | Mixed methods research design |
| 원전 | Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1483344379 | Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1483substitute |
| 별칭 | QUAN-dominant mixed methods, quantitative-dominant mixed methods, quan-priority design, quantitative-first mixed methods | multiphase design, multiproject mixed methods, programmatic mixed methods, multistage mixed methods |
| 관련 | 6 | 6 |
| 요약≠ | Quantitative-priority mixed methods design is a research approach in which quantitative data and analysis carry the primary explanatory weight, while qualitative data play a supplementary or corroborating role. The researcher collects and analyzes quantitative data first (or concurrently with greater emphasis), then uses qualitative findings to elaborate, explain, or contextualize the statistical results. Priority and sequence together define where integration occurs and how each strand informs the other. | The multiphase mixed methods design is a sustained research program in which quantitative and qualitative strands are combined across three or more sequential phases — or across multiple related projects — to address a central program objective. Each phase builds on the prior phase's findings, making the design well-suited to long-term evaluation, intervention development, and large-scale program assessment where a single data-collection cycle cannot fully address the complexity of the research problem. |
| ScholarGate데이터셋 ↗ |
|
|