ScholarGate
어시스턴트

방법 비교

선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.

전향적 진단 정확도 연구×스크리닝 검사 평가×
분야역학역학
계열Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
기원 연도Formalized 2000s; practice dates to mid-20th century1968 (Wilson-Jungner principles); statistical framework developed 1970s–2000s
창시자Established through STARD initiative (Bossuyt, Reitsma et al., 2000s)Wilson & Jungner (WHO criteria, 1968); foundational work by Pepe, Altman, and others in statistical test evaluation
유형Observational / evaluative study designObservational diagnostic / epidemiological evaluation design
원전Bossuyt, P. M., Reitsma, J. B., Bruns, D. E., Gatsonis, C. A., Glasziou, P. P., Irwig, L., ... & Cohen, J. F. (2015). STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies. BMJ, 351, h5527. DOI ↗Wilson, J. M. G., & Jungner, G. (1968). Principles and Practice of Screening for Disease. World Health Organization. Public Health Papers No. 34. link ↗
별칭prospective DTA study, prospective test accuracy study, forward-looking diagnostic study, prospective index test evaluationscreening study, screening performance evaluation, screening accuracy assessment, STE
관련66
요약A prospective diagnostic accuracy study enrolls participants before any test results are known and follows them forward in time to evaluate how well an index test (the test under evaluation) distinguishes individuals with and without a target condition, using a reference standard applied independently. Key accuracy metrics include sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and the area under the ROC curve. The prospective design reduces many biases inherent in retrospective test evaluations.Screening test evaluation is a systematic epidemiological approach for assessing whether a test or program can accurately and cost-effectively identify individuals with a condition before symptoms appear. It quantifies diagnostic performance metrics — sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and the ROC curve — and evaluates whether a screening program meets established public health criteria for adoption and harm-benefit balance.
ScholarGate데이터셋
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED

검색으로 이동 슬라이드 다운로드

ScholarGate방법 비교: Prospective Diagnostic Accuracy Study · Screening Test Evaluation. 2026-06-17에 다음에서 검색함: https://scholargate.app/ko/compare