ScholarGate
어시스턴트

방법 비교

선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.

전향적 진단 정확도 연구×회고적 진단 정확도 연구×
분야역학역학
계열Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
기원 연도Formalized 2000s; practice dates to mid-20th centuryFormalized 2000s; STARD 2003, revised 2015
창시자Established through STARD initiative (Bossuyt, Reitsma et al., 2000s)Formalized through the STARD initiative led by Patrick Bossuyt and colleagues
유형Observational / evaluative study designObservational, retrospective study design
원전Bossuyt, P. M., Reitsma, J. B., Bruns, D. E., Gatsonis, C. A., Glasziou, P. P., Irwig, L., ... & Cohen, J. F. (2015). STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies. BMJ, 351, h5527. DOI ↗Bossuyt, P. M., Reitsma, J. B., Bruns, D. E., et al. (2015). STARD 2015: An Updated List of Essential Items for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies. BMJ, 351, h5527. DOI ↗
별칭prospective DTA study, prospective test accuracy study, forward-looking diagnostic study, prospective index test evaluationretrospective DAS, retrospective test accuracy study, retrospective index test evaluation, historical diagnostic accuracy study
관련65
요약A prospective diagnostic accuracy study enrolls participants before any test results are known and follows them forward in time to evaluate how well an index test (the test under evaluation) distinguishes individuals with and without a target condition, using a reference standard applied independently. Key accuracy metrics include sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and the area under the ROC curve. The prospective design reduces many biases inherent in retrospective test evaluations.A retrospective diagnostic accuracy study evaluates how well a diagnostic test (the index test) correctly identifies a target condition by applying it to previously collected data or archived specimens alongside a reference standard. Because both index test results and reference standard results are drawn from existing records or stored material rather than generated prospectively, this design is faster and less costly than a prospective counterpart — but carries specific methodological risks that must be controlled to produce valid estimates of sensitivity, specificity, and related measures.
ScholarGate데이터셋
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED

검색으로 이동 슬라이드 다운로드

ScholarGate방법 비교: Prospective Diagnostic Accuracy Study · Retrospective diagnostic accuracy study. 2026-06-18에 다음에서 검색함: https://scholargate.app/ko/compare