ScholarGate
어시스턴트

방법 비교

선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.

비율 검정에 대한 검정력 분석×Exact Binomial Test×ANOVA를 위한 검정력 분석×
분야통계학통계학통계학
계열Hypothesis testRegression modelHypothesis test
기원 연도198819881988
창시자Jacob CohenClassical exact test; textbook treatment by Siegel & CastellanJacob Cohen
유형Sample size determinationExact one-sample test for a proportionSample size determination
원전Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. DOI ↗Siegel, S. & Castellan, N. J. (1988). Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill. ISBN: 978-0070573574Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. ISBN: 978-0805802832
별칭proportion power analysis, two-proportion z-test power, z-test for proportions power, Oran Testi Güç Analiziexact binomial test, binomial probability test, exact test for a proportion, Tam Binom TestiANOVA power analysis, F-test power analysis, sample size for ANOVA, Güç Analizi — ANOVA
관련324
요약Power analysis for proportion tests is a prospective sample-size planning method used to determine how many participants are needed to detect a meaningful difference between two (or one) proportions with a specified probability. Formalised by Jacob Cohen in his 1988 landmark text, it applies the arcsine transformation to convert proportions into the effect-size index h, enabling direct calculation of the required sample size.The exact binomial test checks whether the observed number of successes in a fixed number of independent trials is consistent with a pre-specified success probability p₀. Because it computes exact binomial tail probabilities rather than relying on a normal approximation, it is the gold standard for testing a proportion in small samples; this two-sided formulation follows Siegel & Castellan's classic treatment (1988).Power analysis for ANOVA is a prospective statistical technique that determines the minimum sample size needed to detect a specified group mean difference with a chosen probability. Formalized by Jacob Cohen in his 1988 monograph, it translates a researcher's effect size expectation — expressed as Cohen's f — along with the desired Type I error rate (alpha) and statistical power (1 − beta) into a concrete per-group sample size recommendation for one-way or factorial ANOVA designs.
ScholarGate데이터셋
  1. v1
  2. 1 출처
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 출처
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 출처
  3. PUBLISHED

검색으로 이동 슬라이드 다운로드

ScholarGate방법 비교: Power Analysis for Proportions · Binomial Test · Power Analysis for ANOVA. 2026-06-18에 다음에서 검색함: https://scholargate.app/ko/compare