ScholarGate
어시스턴트

방법 비교

선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.

Politeness Analysis×비판적 담론 분석×
분야언어학질적 방법
계열Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
기원 연도1987Late 1970s–1990s (systematised ~1979–1995)
창시자Penelope Brown and Stephen C. LevinsonNorman Fairclough; Teun A. van Dijk; Ruth Wodak
유형Qualitative analysis of linguistic politeness via face theoryQualitative research method
원전Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 9780521313551Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Polity Press. link ↗
별칭Face Theory Analysis, Politeness Strategy Analysis, Linguistic Politeness AnalysisCDA, Critical Linguistics, Discourse-Historical Approach, Dialectical-Relational Analysis
관련46
요약Politeness analysis is the qualitative method of examining how speakers manage face — the public self-image people claim — when they perform acts that threaten it. Anchored in Penelope Brown and Stephen Levinson's influential face theory, the analyst locates face-threatening acts in interaction, codes the strategy chosen to soften (or not soften) them, and relates that choice to the weight of the threat as a function of social distance, relative power, and the ranking of the imposition. The framework's enduring scheme of strategies — bald on-record, positive politeness, negative politeness, and off-record — gives politeness phenomena a systematic, comparable description.Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) is a qualitative method that examines how language in texts and talk constructs, sustains, and challenges relations of power, ideology, and social inequality. Drawing on linguistics, social theory, and critical philosophy, CDA treats discourse not merely as communication but as social practice — a site where dominance is reproduced and where resistance can be articulated. Developed in the late twentieth century by Norman Fairclough, Teun van Dijk, and Ruth Wodak, among others, CDA is applied to political speeches, media texts, policy documents, educational materials, and institutional interactions.
ScholarGate데이터셋
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED

검색으로 이동 슬라이드 다운로드

ScholarGate방법 비교: Politeness Analysis · Critical Discourse Analysis. 2026-06-24에 다음에서 검색함: https://scholargate.app/ko/compare