ScholarGate
어시스턴트

방법 비교

선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.

CEM(Coarsened Exact Matching)을 이용한 정책 평가×엔트로피 균형×
분야인과추론인과추론
계열Regression modelRegression model
기원 연도2011-20122012
창시자Iacus, King & PorroJens Hainmueller
유형Matching / quasi-experimental designCovariate-balancing reweighting
원전Iacus, S. M., King, G., & Porro, G. (2012). Causal inference without balance checking: Coarsened exact matching. Political Analysis, 20(1), 1-24. DOI ↗Hainmueller, J. (2012). Entropy balancing for causal effects: A multivariate reweighting method to produce balanced samples in observational studies. Political Analysis, 20(1), 25-46. DOI ↗
별칭CEM, Coarsened Exact Matching, CEM policy evaluation, coarsening-based matchingEB, entropy reweighting, covariate balancing via entropy, Hainmueller balancing
관련56
요약Coarsened Exact Matching (CEM) is a quasi-experimental causal-inference technique that creates balanced treatment and control groups from observational data by temporarily coarsening covariates into bins, exactly matching units within those bins, and then pruning unmatched observations before estimating policy effects. Introduced by Iacus, King, and Porro, CEM belongs to the monotonic imbalance bounding family of matching methods and is especially popular in policy evaluation.Entropy balancing is a preprocessing method for causal inference that assigns weights to control-group units so that the reweighted control sample matches the treatment group exactly on a chosen set of covariate moments (means, variances, skewness). Introduced by Hainmueller (2012), it replaces trial-and-error propensity-score trimming with a constrained maximum-entropy optimisation that achieves balance in a single step.
ScholarGate데이터셋
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED

검색으로 이동 슬라이드 다운로드

ScholarGate방법 비교: Policy Evaluation Coarsened Exact Matching · Entropy Balancing. 2026-06-19에 다음에서 검색함: https://scholargate.app/ko/compare