방법 비교
선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.
| 정책 평가 인과적 영향 분석× | 인과 충격 분석× | |
|---|---|---|
| 분야 | 인과추론 | 인과추론 |
| 계열 | Regression model | Regression model |
| 기원 연도 | 2015 | 2015 |
| 창시자≠ | Brodersen, Gallusser, Koehler, Remy & Scott (2015); adapted for policy evaluation contexts | Kay H. Brodersen, Fabian Gallusser, Jim Koehler, Nicolas Remy, Steven L. Scott (Google) |
| 유형≠ | Bayesian counterfactual / time-series | Bayesian causal inference / counterfactual forecasting |
| 원전 | Brodersen, K. H., Gallusser, F., Koehler, J., Remy, N., & Scott, S. L. (2015). Inferring causal impact using Bayesian structural time-series models. Annals of Applied Statistics, 9(1), 247-274. DOI ↗ | Brodersen, K. H., Gallusser, F., Koehler, J., Remy, N., & Scott, S. L. (2015). Inferring causal impact using Bayesian structural time-series models. Annals of Applied Statistics, 9(1), 247-274. DOI ↗ |
| 별칭 | policy causal impact, BSTS policy evaluation, Bayesian policy impact assessment, CIA policy evaluation | CausalImpact, BSTS causal inference, Bayesian causal impact, counterfactual time-series analysis |
| 관련≠ | 6 | 5 |
| 요약≠ | Policy Evaluation Causal Impact Analysis applies the Bayesian structural time-series (BSTS) framework of Brodersen et al. (2015) to estimate the causal effect of a policy intervention on aggregate outcomes. By constructing a synthetic counterfactual from pre-policy data and control covariates, it asks: what would have happened had the policy not been enacted? The difference between observed and predicted post-policy outcomes is the estimated policy effect. | Causal Impact Analysis, introduced by Brodersen et al. (2015) at Google, uses Bayesian structural time-series models to estimate what would have happened to an outcome had an intervention never occurred. By constructing a probabilistic counterfactual from pre-treatment data and control covariates, it quantifies point-in-time and cumulative treatment effects with full posterior uncertainty intervals. |
| ScholarGate데이터셋 ↗ |
|
|