방법 비교
선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.
| PIvot Pairwise RElative Criteria Importance Assessment× | 가법 비율 평가× | |
|---|---|---|
| 분야 | 의사결정 | 의사결정 |
| 계열 | MCDM | MCDM |
| 기원 연도≠ | 2017 | 2010 |
| 창시자≠ | Stanujkić, D., Karabašević, D., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., Maksimović, M. | Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. |
| 유형≠ | Pivot pairwise sequential ratio weighting | Additive utility ratio (optimal reference row) |
| 원전≠ | Stanujkić, D., Karabašević, D., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., Maksimović, M. (2017). An approach to determining customer satisfaction in mobile commerce: A new approach to the SWARA method — PIPRECIA. Transformations in Business & Economics link ↗ | Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2010). A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision-making. Technological and Economic Development of Economy link ↗ |
| 별칭 | — | — |
| 관련 | 8 | 8 |
| 요약≠ | PIPRECIA (PIvot Pairwise RElative Criteria Importance Assessment) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Stanujkić, D., Karabašević, D., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., Maksimović, M. in 2017. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | ARAS (Additive Ratio Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGate데이터셋 ↗ |
|
|