방법 비교
선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.
| 파일럿 현장 실험× | 군집 무작위 대조 시험× | |
|---|---|---|
| 분야≠ | 실험설계 | 임상연구 |
| 계열 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 기원 연도≠ | Mid-20th century (systematised 1960s–1990s) | 1999-2000 |
| 창시자≠ | Rooted in Campbell & Stanley (1966) experimental design tradition; formalised in clinical and social research through the 20th century | Campbell, Grimshaw, Elbourne et al. |
| 유형≠ | Experimental design | Research Design |
| 원전≠ | Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1966). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Rand McNally. ISBN: 978-0395307878 | Campbell, M. K., Grimshaw, J. M., & Elbourne, D. R. (2000). Intracluster correlation coefficients in cluster randomized trials: empirical insights into how should they be reported. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 4, 30. link ↗ |
| 별칭 | pilot field trial, small-scale field experiment, feasibility field experiment, exploratory field experiment | CRT, cluster RCT, cluster trial, group randomization |
| 관련 | 3 | 3 |
| 요약≠ | A pilot field experiment is a small-scale, preliminary version of a planned full field experiment conducted in a naturalistic setting. It tests whether the intervention, randomisation procedure, measurement instruments, and logistical protocols are feasible before committing to a full-scale study. Results inform sample size calculations, refine treatment protocols, and identify procedural risks — saving resources and improving the quality of the definitive study. | A cluster randomized trial (CRT) randomizes intact groups—schools, clinics, villages, or hospital wards—rather than individuals. Developed by Campbell, Grimshaw, and colleagues in the late 1990s to address real-world settings where intervention delivery or contamination occurs at the group level, CRTs are now standard for evaluating population-level, community-based, and policy interventions. |
| ScholarGate데이터셋 ↗ |
|
|