ScholarGate
어시스턴트

방법 비교

선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.

Picture-Naming Task×Elicited Imitation Task×
분야언어학언어학
계열Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
기원 연도19802002
창시자Psycholinguists of word production (Joan Snodgrass; Willem Levelt)Applied linguists and child-language researchers (overview by Thora Vinther)
유형Online measure of lexical access in speech productionProficiency/implicit-knowledge measure via sentence repetition
원전Snodgrass, J. G., & Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6(2), 174–215. DOI ↗Vinther, T. (2002). Elicited imitation: A brief overview. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12(1), 54–73. DOI ↗
별칭Picture Naming, Confrontation Naming Task, Object Naming TaskElicited Imitation, Sentence Repetition Task, EIT
관련33
요약In the picture-naming task, participants see a pictured object and say its name aloud as quickly and accurately as possible. The time from the picture appearing to the onset of speech — the naming latency — together with the accuracy and type of response, indexes the cognitive route from seeing an object to retrieving and articulating its word. Because that route runs through conceptual preparation, lexical selection, phonological encoding, and articulation, the task is a central tool for studying lexical access in speech production, for probing bilingual word retrieval, and for assessing word-finding ability in aphasia and other clinical conditions.In the elicited imitation task, participants listen to spoken sentences — typically of increasing length and grammatical complexity — and repeat each one back. The key insight is that when a sentence exceeds short-term verbatim memory, accurate reproduction is impossible by rote echoing; the listener must comprehend the sentence and reconstruct it through their own grammar. Reproduction accuracy therefore indexes implicit linguistic proficiency rather than parroting. Widely used in second-language acquisition as an efficient proficiency measure and in child-language research to gauge developing grammar, it has been validated as a window onto implicit knowledge.
ScholarGate데이터셋
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED

검색으로 이동 슬라이드 다운로드

ScholarGate방법 비교: Picture-Naming Task · Elicited Imitation Task. 2026-06-24에 다음에서 검색함: https://scholargate.app/ko/compare