방법 비교
선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.
| Picker 환자 경험 설문지× | 환자 역량 강화 도구 (Patient Enablement Instrument)× | |
|---|---|---|
| 분야 | 환자 중심 의료 | 환자 중심 의료 |
| 계열 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 기원 연도≠ | 2002 | 1998 |
| 창시자≠ | Picker Institute | J. G. Howie |
| 유형 | Patient-reported | Patient-reported |
| 원전≠ | Jenkinson, C., Coulter, A., Bruster, S., Richards, N., & Chandola, T. (2002). Patients' experiences and satisfaction with health care: results of a questionnaire study of specific aspects of care. British Medical Journal, 324(7329), 860-864. DOI ↗ | Howie, J. G., Heaney, D. J., Maxwell, M., & Zwanenberg, D. (1998). A comparison of a Patient Enablement Instrument (PEI) against two other consultations outcome measures. British Journal of General Practice, 48(427), 1211-1216. link ↗ |
| 별칭 | Picker PPE, Picker Institute Survey | PEI, Patient Enablement Score |
| 관련 | 4 | 4 |
| 요약≠ | The Picker Patient Experience Questionnaire is a comprehensive, validated instrument developed by the Picker Institute to measure the quality of the patient experience across multiple dimensions of healthcare delivery. Administered post-discharge or post-encounter, it assesses ten domains of patient-centered care: respect and dignity, information and communication, emotional support, involvement in decisions, continuity of care, coordination, access, physical comfort, emotional needs, and overall experience. The Picker questionnaire has become a standard measure in health systems internationally for evaluating and improving patient experience and has been used extensively in both inpatient and outpatient settings. | The Patient Enablement Instrument (PEI) is a brief, validated six-item questionnaire that measures the degree to which a clinical consultation leaves the patient feeling more capable of understanding and managing their health condition. Developed by Howie and colleagues in 1998, the PEI assesses whether the consultation helped the patient understand their problem, cope with their illness, and manage their health more effectively. The scale captures the empowering effect of good clinical practice and is widely used in general practice research, quality improvement, and studies evaluating patient-centered and collaborative consultation styles. |
| ScholarGate데이터셋 ↗ |
|
|