ScholarGate
어시스턴트

방법 비교

선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.

확률적 망설임 확장 COPRAS×FUCOM (Full Consistency Method)×
분야의사결정의사결정
계열MCDMMCDM
기원 연도20212018
창시자Song, H. F. Chen, Z. C.Pamučar, D., Stević, Ž., Sremac, S.
유형Probabilistic Hesitant ranking — Probabilistic Hesitant Fuzzy Element (PHFE: {γ|p} pairs)Pairwise priority + consistency constraint LP weighting
원전Song, H. F., Chen, Z. C. (2021). Multi-attribute decision-making method based distance and COPRAS method with probabilistic hesitant fuzzy environment. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems DOI ↗Pamučar, D., Stević, Ž., Sremac, S. (2018). A new model for determining weight coefficients of criteria in MCDM models: Full consistency method (FUCOM). Symmetry DOI ↗
별칭
관련88
요약PHF-COPRAS (Probabilistic Hesitant extension of COPRAS) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Song, H. F. Chen, Z. C. in 2021. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.FUCOM (Full Consistency Method) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Pamučar, D., Stević, Ž., Sremac, S. in 2018. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGate데이터셋
  1. v1
  2. 1 출처
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 출처
  3. PUBLISHED

검색으로 이동 슬라이드 다운로드

ScholarGate방법 비교: PHF-COPRAS · FUCOM. 2026-06-15에 다음에서 검색함: https://scholargate.app/ko/compare