방법 비교
선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.
| 환자 보고 의사소통 척도× | CollaboRATE 공유 의사결정 척도× | |
|---|---|---|
| 분야 | 환자 중심 의료 | 환자 중심 의료 |
| 계열 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 기원 연도≠ | 2009 | 2013 |
| 창시자≠ | Marianne Haskard Zolnierek, Roxane Dimateo | Glyn Elwyn |
| 유형 | Patient-reported | Patient-reported |
| 원전≠ | Haskard Zolnierek, K. B., & DiMatteo, M. R. (2009). Physician communication and patient adherence to treatment: a meta-analysis. Medical Care, 47(8), 826-834. DOI ↗ | Elwyn, G., Barr, P. J., Grande, S. W., Thompson, R., Walsh, T., & Ozanne, E. M. (2013). Developing CollaboRATE: A fast and frugal patient-reported measure of shared decision making in clinical encounters. Patient Education and Counseling, 93(1), 102-107. DOI ↗ |
| 별칭≠ | PRCS Clinician Communication, Communication Quality Scale | Collaborative Therapeutic Engagement Scale |
| 관련 | 4 | 4 |
| 요약≠ | The Patient-Reported Communication Scale (PRCS) is a brief, validated instrument that measures patients' perceptions of clinician communication quality in healthcare encounters. Developed through meta-analytic research by Haskard Zolnierek and DiMatteo, the PRCS assesses key dimensions of effective patient-clinician communication: clarity of explanations, listening, showing respect and empathy, and addressing patient concerns. The scale is used to evaluate clinician communication competence, identify training needs, and correlate communication quality with patient adherence, satisfaction, and health outcomes. | CollaboRATE is a three-item patient-reported outcome measure designed to assess shared decision making (SDM) quality in clinical consultations. Developed by Glyn Elwyn and colleagues in 2013, it measures the degree to which clinicians involve patients in decisions about their care through simple, actionable items that are easy to administer and interpret. The scale has become a standard benchmark for evaluating SDM implementation in healthcare systems. |
| ScholarGate데이터셋 ↗ |
|
|