방법 비교

	Partisan Social Identity Scale	Collective Narcissism Scale
분야	정치심리학	정치심리학
계열	Latent structure	Latent structure
기원 연도	2015	2009
창시자	Leonie Huddy, Lilliana Mason & Lene Aaroe; Steven Greene	Agnieszka Golec de Zavala and colleagues
유형	Identity-strength scale for partisanship	Attitude scale for defensive group identity
원전	Huddy, L., Mason, L., & Aaroe, L. (2015). Expressive Partisanship: Campaign Involvement, Political Emotion, and Partisan Identity. American Political Science Review, 109(1), 1-17.	Golec de Zavala, A., Cichocka, A., Eidelson, R., & Jayawickreme, N. (2009). Collective Narcissism and Its Social Consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(6), 1074-1096.
별칭	Partisan Identity Strength Scale, Expressive Partisanship Scale, Huddy-Mason-Aaroe Partisan Identity Measure, Partisan In-Group Identification Scale	Group Narcissism Scale, National Collective Narcissism Measure, Golec de Zavala Collective Narcissism Scale, In-Group Grandiosity Scale
관련	3	3
요약	The Partisan Social Identity Scale treats party identification as a social identity in the sense of Henri Tajfel rather than as a running tally of policy agreement. Building on Steven Greene's social-identity approach and crystallized in Huddy, Mason, and Aaroe's 2015 study of expressive partisanship, the scale adapts standard group-identification items to ask how central, important, and emotionally engaging a person's party is to their sense of self. Strongly identified partisans are shown to feel action-oriented emotions, anger when their side is threatened and enthusiasm when reassured, and to participate in campaigns more than issue-based measures of partisanship predict.	The Collective Narcissism Scale, introduced by Agnieszka Golec de Zavala and colleagues in 2009, measures an emotional investment in an unrealistic belief about an in-group's greatness coupled with a demand that this greatness be recognized by others. Unlike secure group identification, collective narcissism is defensive and contingent on external validation, and it predicts intergroup hostility, perceived threat, prejudice, conspiracy belief, and support for aggression toward out-groups. The scale is widely applied to national identity, where it distinguishes a grandiose, grievance-driven nationalism from ordinary patriotism or in-group satisfaction.