방법 비교
선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.
| 참여적 비판 담론 분석× | 비판적 담론 분석× | |
|---|---|---|
| 분야 | 질적 방법 | 질적 방법 |
| 계열 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 기원 연도≠ | 1990s–2000s (emerged as integrated approach) | Late 1970s–1990s (systematised ~1979–1995) |
| 창시자≠ | Draws on Ruth Wodak, Norman Fairclough (CDA) and Kurt Lewin, Orlando Fals Borda (participatory action research) | Norman Fairclough; Teun A. van Dijk; Ruth Wodak |
| 유형≠ | Qualitative research design and analysis approach | Qualitative research method |
| 원전≠ | Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (Eds.). (2001). Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. Sage. ISBN: 978-0761961543 | Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Polity Press. link ↗ |
| 별칭 | PCDA, participatory CDA, collaborative critical discourse analysis, action-oriented CDA | CDA, Critical Linguistics, Discourse-Historical Approach, Dialectical-Relational Analysis |
| 관련 | 6 | 6 |
| 요약≠ | Participatory Critical Discourse Analysis (PCDA) integrates the ideology-exposing tools of Critical Discourse Analysis with the community-centred ethics of participatory action research. Researchers and community members jointly collect and analyse texts and talk to reveal how language constructs, legitimises, or contests unequal power relations — and then use those insights to drive concrete social change. | Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) is a qualitative method that examines how language in texts and talk constructs, sustains, and challenges relations of power, ideology, and social inequality. Drawing on linguistics, social theory, and critical philosophy, CDA treats discourse not merely as communication but as social practice — a site where dominance is reproduced and where resistance can be articulated. Developed in the late twentieth century by Norman Fairclough, Teun van Dijk, and Ruth Wodak, among others, CDA is applied to political speeches, media texts, policy documents, educational materials, and institutional interactions. |
| ScholarGate데이터셋 ↗ |
|
|