ScholarGate
어시스턴트

방법 비교

선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.

참여적 대화 분석×참여적 실행 연구 (PAR)×
분야질적 방법질적 방법
계열Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
기원 연도2000s–2010s (building on CA foundations from the 1960s–1970s)1940s (Lewin); PAR as distinct tradition formalised ~1970s–1980s
창시자Developed from Harvey Sacks, Emanuel Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson's Conversation Analysis tradition; participatory variant emerged in applied and practitioner research contexts in the 2000s–2010sKurt Lewin (action research foundations, 1940s); systematised for participatory contexts by Orlando Fals Borda, Paulo Freire, and William Foote Whyte
유형Qualitative research methodQualitative research method
원전Lee, E., & Howes, C. (2020). Conversation analysis as a creative research methodology. Early Child Development and Care, 190(2), 1–14. link ↗Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2014). The Action Research Planner: Doing Critical Participatory Action Research. Springer. link ↗
별칭PCA, collaborative conversation analysis, practitioner-involved CA, participatory CAPAR, community-based participatory research, collaborative action research, participatory inquiry
관련46
요약Participatory Conversation Analysis (PCA) extends classical Conversation Analysis by actively involving the people whose talk is being studied in the analytical process. Rather than treating analysis as the researcher's exclusive domain, PCA invites practitioners, community members, or research participants to co-review recordings or transcripts of their own interaction, contribute insider meanings, and collaboratively refine the interpretation of interactional patterns. The approach is widely used in education, healthcare communication, and professional learning contexts.Participatory Action Research (PAR) is a qualitative, community-centred methodology in which researchers and community members collaborate as co-investigators to identify a shared problem, take deliberate action, observe outcomes, and reflect critically on results — cycling iteratively until meaningful change is achieved. Unlike conventional research that studies people from the outside, PAR treats participants as active agents who co-own the research process, the knowledge produced, and the practical interventions that follow.
ScholarGate데이터셋
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED

검색으로 이동 슬라이드 다운로드

ScholarGate방법 비교: Participatory Conversation Analysis · Participatory Action Research. 2026-06-19에 다음에서 검색함: https://scholargate.app/ko/compare