방법 비교
선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.
| 서열 명제적 타당도× | 순서형 측정 불변성 검증× | |
|---|---|---|
| 분야 | 심리측정학 | 심리측정학 |
| 계열 | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| 기원 연도≠ | 1955 (concept); ordinal application 1990s–present | 1984–2011 |
| 창시자≠ | Cronbach & Meehl (nomological network concept); ordinal extension in modern psychometrics | Roger Millsap; Bengt Muthén |
| 유형≠ | Validity assessment | Multi-group model comparison |
| 원전≠ | Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗ | Millsap, R. E. (2011). Statistical Approaches to Measurement Invariance. Routledge. ISBN: 978-1848728936 |
| 별칭 | nomological validity for ordinal data, ordinal nomological network, construct network validity (ordinal), ordinal criterion-related validity | ordinal MI, measurement invariance for ordinal data, ordinal CFA invariance, categorical measurement invariance |
| 관련≠ | 5 | 6 |
| 요약≠ | Ordinal nomological validity examines whether a construct measured with ordinal items (e.g., Likert-type scales) behaves in theoretically predicted ways within a nomological network — a web of expected relationships with other constructs and criteria — using methods suited to ordinal data rather than assuming continuous measurement. | Ordinal measurement invariance testing evaluates whether a multi-group confirmatory factor model holds equivalent measurement properties across groups when scale items are ordinal — such as Likert-type response scales. It uses polychoric correlations and categorical estimators (WLSMV/DWLS) rather than Pearson-based methods, correcting the systematic bias that arises when ordinal data are treated as continuous. |
| ScholarGate데이터셋 ↗ |
|
|