ScholarGate
어시스턴트

방법 비교

선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.

새로운 객관적 기준 가중치 결정 방법×절충적 결합 해법×
분야의사결정의사결정
계열MCDMMCDM
기원 연도20172019
창시자Bulut, E.Yazdani, M., Zarate, P., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z.
유형Weight_Objective (normalised matrix column-mean based)Aggregated exponential comparison (WSM + WPM combination)
원전Bulut, E. (2017). A comparative analysis of the criteria weights determination methods for selection of ship propulsion system. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part M: Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment link ↗Yazdani, M., Zarate, P., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2019). A combined compromise solution (COCOSO) method for multi-criteria decision-making problems. Management Decision DOI ↗
별칭
관련88
요약NMD (New Method of Determining objective criterion weights) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Bulut, E. in 2017. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.COCOSO (Combined Compromise Solution) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Yazdani, M., Zarate, P., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. in 2019. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGate데이터셋
  1. v1
  2. 1 출처
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 출처
  3. PUBLISHED

검색으로 이동 슬라이드 다운로드

ScholarGate방법 비교: NMD · COCOSO. 2026-06-18에 다음에서 검색함: https://scholargate.app/ko/compare