ScholarGate
어시스턴트

방법 비교

선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.

네트워크 기반 매핑 검토×스코핑 리뷰×
분야과학계량학과학계량학
계열Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
기원 연도2000s–2010s2005
창시자Petticrew & Roberts (mapping review); network overlay adopted from bibliometric network analysis traditionHilary Arksey & Lisa O'Malley
유형Evidence synthesis method with network analysis overlayEvidence synthesis review design
원전Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide. Blackwell Publishing. ISBN: 978-1405121101Arksey, H., & O'Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. DOI ↗
별칭network mapping review, citation-network mapping review, network-enhanced evidence mapping, network-informed mapping reviewscoping study, literature scoping, evidence mapping review, rapid evidence map
관련66
요약A network-based mapping review combines the breadth of a traditional evidence mapping exercise with bibliometric network analysis to chart the structural landscape of a research field. Rather than simply cataloguing studies by topic, this approach constructs citation, co-authorship, or co-word networks to reveal clusters of intellectual activity, influential works, and collaboration patterns — producing both a visual and a descriptive map of the evidence base.A scoping review is a systematic evidence-synthesis method that maps the breadth and nature of research on a topic — identifying key concepts, evidence types, and gaps — without necessarily appraising study quality or pooling effect sizes. Developed by Arksey and O'Malley (2005) and refined by Levac and colleagues (2010), it is particularly valuable for emerging or heterogeneous fields where a full systematic review would be premature or infeasible.
ScholarGate데이터셋
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED

검색으로 이동 슬라이드 다운로드

ScholarGate방법 비교: Network-based Mapping review · Scoping Review. 2026-06-18에 다음에서 검색함: https://scholargate.app/ko/compare