방법 비교
선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.
| 네트워크 기반 매핑 검토× | 매핑 검토× | |
|---|---|---|
| 분야 | 과학계량학 | 과학계량학 |
| 계열 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 기원 연도≠ | 2000s–2010s | Late 1990s–2000s; major methodological formalization ~2010s |
| 창시자≠ | Petticrew & Roberts (mapping review); network overlay adopted from bibliometric network analysis tradition | Buckland & Gann (1998); formalized by systematic review community (Campbell Collaboration, Collaboration for Environmental Evidence) |
| 유형≠ | Evidence synthesis method with network analysis overlay | Systematic evidence mapping methodology |
| 원전≠ | Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide. Blackwell Publishing. ISBN: 978-1405121101 | James, K. L., Randall, N. P., & Haddaway, N. R. (2016). A methodology for systematic mapping in environmental sciences. Environmental Evidence, 5(1), 7. DOI ↗ |
| 별칭 | network mapping review, citation-network mapping review, network-enhanced evidence mapping, network-informed mapping review | evidence map, systematic map, research map, literature map |
| 관련 | 6 | 6 |
| 요약≠ | A network-based mapping review combines the breadth of a traditional evidence mapping exercise with bibliometric network analysis to chart the structural landscape of a research field. Rather than simply cataloguing studies by topic, this approach constructs citation, co-authorship, or co-word networks to reveal clusters of intellectual activity, influential works, and collaboration patterns — producing both a visual and a descriptive map of the evidence base. | A mapping review (also called a systematic map or evidence map) is a form of systematic review that aims to chart the extent, range, and nature of evidence on a broad topic rather than synthesize findings into a single pooled answer. It categorizes studies by key dimensions — such as intervention type, population, outcome, and study design — and presents the resulting landscape visually and tabularly so that researchers and practitioners can identify clusters of evidence, knowledge gaps, and priorities for future primary research or deeper synthesis. |
| ScholarGate데이터셋 ↗ |
|
|