ScholarGate
어시스턴트

방법 비교

선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.

Need for Closure Scale×Motivated Reasoning Experiment×
분야정치심리학정치심리학
계열Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
기원 연도19942006
창시자Donna M. Webster & Arie W. KruglanskiCharles Taber & Milton Lodge
유형Self-report individual-difference scaleSurvey/lab experiment
원전Webster, D. M., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1994). Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(6), 1049-1062. DOI ↗Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 755-769. DOI ↗
별칭NFCS, Need for Cognitive Closure Scale, Webster-Kruglanski ScaleDirectional Motivated Reasoning Study, Biased Assimilation Experiment, Disconfirmation Bias Paradigm
관련44
요약The Need for Cognitive Closure Scale, developed by Webster and Kruglanski (1994), measures a stable individual difference in the desire for a firm, definite answer to a question and an aversion to ambiguity and uncertainty. High need for closure is a key epistemic-motivation construct in political psychology, linked to conservatism, prejudice, intolerance of dissent, and resistance to belief change.A motivated reasoning experiment tests whether people process political information to reach conclusions they are directionally motivated to hold rather than the most accurate ones. Building on Kunda's (1990) theory and crystallized by Taber and Lodge (2006), these designs expose partisans to attitude-congruent and incongruent arguments and measure biased assimilation, disconfirmation bias, attitude polarization, and selective exposure.
ScholarGate데이터셋
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED

검색으로 이동 슬라이드 다운로드

ScholarGate방법 비교: Need for Closure Scale · Motivated Reasoning Experiment. 2026-06-25에 다음에서 검색함: https://scholargate.app/ko/compare