방법 비교
선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.
| 다변량 인과-비교 연구× | 판별 분석× | |
|---|---|---|
| 분야≠ | 연구설계 | 통계학 |
| 계열≠ | Process / pipeline | Latent structure |
| 기원 연도≠ | Mid-20th century onward; multivariate extension systematized 1970s–1990s | 1936 |
| 창시자≠ | Extension of causal-comparative tradition (cf. Chapin, 1947; Gay, Mills & Airasian) | Ronald A. Fisher |
| 유형≠ | Quantitative non-experimental comparative design | Supervised classification and dimension reduction |
| 원전≠ | Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2019). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill. ISBN: 978-1260085594 | Fisher, R. A. (1936). The use of multiple measurements in taxonomic problems. Annals of Eugenics, 7(2), 179–188. DOI ↗ |
| 별칭 | multivariate causal-comparative design, MANOVA causal-comparative study, multi-outcome ex post facto research, multivariate ex post facto design | LDA, Fisher discriminant analysis, discriminant function analysis, canonical discriminant analysis |
| 관련≠ | 6 | 4 |
| 요약≠ | Multivariate causal-comparative research is a quantitative, non-experimental design that investigates whether pre-existing group differences (defined by a naturally occurring categorical variable) are associated with differences across multiple outcome variables considered simultaneously. By extending the classic causal-comparative framework to several dependent variables at once, it reduces Type I error inflation and captures the correlated structure of outcomes that univariate comparisons would miss. | Discriminant analysis finds linear combinations of predictor variables that best separate two or more known groups. It is used both to understand which predictors distinguish the groups and to classify new observations into those groups with minimum error. |
| ScholarGate데이터셋 ↗ |
|
|