방법 비교
선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.
| 다중 사례 기반 스트라우스식 근거 이론× | Constructivist Grounded Theory× | |
|---|---|---|
| 분야 | 질적 방법 | 질적 방법 |
| 계열 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 기원 연도≠ | 1990s (synthesis of Strauss & Corbin 1990 and multi-case design conventions) | 2000s (Charmaz 2000–2006; classic GT roots 1967) |
| 창시자≠ | Anselm Strauss & Juliet Corbin (Straussian GT); multiple-case design formalized by Robert K. Yin and Kathleen Eisenhardt | Kathy Charmaz (building on Glaser & Strauss, 1967) |
| 유형≠ | Qualitative research design and analytic strategy | Qualitative research method |
| 원전≠ | Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Sage. ISBN: 978-0803932500 | Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. Sage. ISBN: 978-0761973539 |
| 별칭 | multi-case Straussian GT, Strauss-Corbin grounded theory across cases, multiple-site Straussian grounded theory, multi-case GT (Strauss & Corbin) | CGT, constructivist GT, Charmaz grounded theory, interpretive grounded theory |
| 관련 | 6 | 6 |
| 요약≠ | Multiple case-based Straussian grounded theory combines Strauss and Corbin's systematic coding procedures — open, axial, and selective coding — with a multiple case design in which the same grounded theory analysis is conducted across two or more purposively selected cases. The approach aims to generate a mid-range theory grounded in rich, cross-case qualitative data while capitalizing on the comparative leverage offered by multiple sites or units, ultimately producing a theory with broader scope and stronger transferability than a single-case grounded theory study. | Constructivist Grounded Theory (CGT) is a qualitative methodology developed by Kathy Charmaz that systematically builds mid-range theory from empirical data through iterative coding, memo-writing, and theoretical sampling. Unlike the original objectivist version by Glaser and Strauss, CGT treats both data and theory as co-constructed between researcher and participants, acknowledging the researcher's interpretive perspective as an integral part of the analytic process rather than a source of bias to be eliminated. |
| ScholarGate데이터셋 ↗ |
|
|