ScholarGate
어시스턴트

방법 비교

선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.

다중 사례 기반 은유 분석×Thematic Analysis×
분야질적 방법질적 연구
계열Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
기원 연도1980s–2000s (synthesis emerged in qualitative case research)2006
창시자Building on Lakoff & Johnson (1980) conceptual metaphor theory and Yin's multiple-case logicVirginia Braun and Victoria Clarke
유형Qualitative comparative designMethod
원전Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press. ISBN: 978-0226468013Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗
별칭cross-case metaphor analysis, comparative metaphor analysis, multi-case metaphor study, MCBMATA, Reflexive Thematic Analysis
관련63
요약Multiple case-based metaphor analysis is a qualitative comparative method that systematically identifies and interprets metaphorical language across two or more bounded cases — such as schools, organisations, or participant groups — to reveal how people in different contexts conceptualise a shared phenomenon. It integrates Lakoff and Johnson's conceptual metaphor theory with Yin's multiple-case logic, enabling both within-case depth and cross-case breadth.Thematic Analysis (TA) is a qualitative research methodology for identifying, analyzing, and reporting patterns (themes) in qualitative data. Developed systematically by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke (2006), TA is flexible and accessible, applicable across diverse theoretical frameworks and data types, making it one of the most widely used qualitative methods in psychology, health research, and social sciences.
ScholarGate데이터셋
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 출처
  3. PUBLISHED

검색으로 이동 슬라이드 다운로드

ScholarGate방법 비교: Multiple Case-Based Metaphor Analysis · Thematic Analysis. 2026-06-17에 다음에서 검색함: https://scholargate.app/ko/compare