방법 비교
선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.
| 다중 사례 기반 대화 분석× | 담화 분석× | |
|---|---|---|
| 분야≠ | 질적 방법 | 질적 연구 |
| 계열 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 기원 연도≠ | CA founded ~1960s–1970s; multi-case extension adopted from late 1990s onward | 1989 (Fairclough); 1987 (Potter & Wetherell) |
| 창시자≠ | Harvey Sacks, Emanuel Schegloff, Gail Jefferson (CA); multiple-case design from Robert Yin | Norman Fairclough; Jonathan Potter and Margaret Wetherell |
| 유형≠ | Qualitative multi-case analytic design | Method |
| 원전≠ | Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. DOI ↗ | Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman. link ↗ |
| 별칭≠ | multi-case CA, cross-case conversation analysis, comparative conversation analysis, multiple-instance CA | DA, Critical Discourse Analysis, Discursive Analysis |
| 관련≠ | 5 | 2 |
| 요약≠ | Multiple case-based conversation analysis applies the fine-grained sequential methods of Conversation Analysis (CA) across two or more distinct cases — settings, groups, or interactions — to identify both case-specific patterns and cross-case regularities in naturally occurring talk. By examining how participants organise turn-taking, repair, and action sequences in multiple contexts, the approach strengthens claims about interactional phenomena beyond what a single-case study can establish. | Discourse analysis is a qualitative research methodology that examines how language, communication, and power shape meaning, identity, and social reality. Developed across linguistics, sociology, and psychology (particularly by Norman Fairclough and Jonathan Potter), discourse analysis goes beyond content to analyze language use as a social practice that constitutes and reflects power relations, ideologies, and social structures. |
| ScholarGate데이터셋 ↗ |
|
|