방법 비교
선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.
| 다중 사례 기반 대화 분석× | 비교 대화 분석× | |
|---|---|---|
| 분야 | 질적 방법 | 질적 방법 |
| 계열 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 기원 연도≠ | CA founded ~1960s–1970s; multi-case extension adopted from late 1990s onward | 1974 (CA foundation); comparative applications from 1980s–1990s |
| 창시자≠ | Harvey Sacks, Emanuel Schegloff, Gail Jefferson (CA); multiple-case design from Robert Yin | Harvey Sacks, Emanuel Schegloff, Gail Jefferson (CA foundation); comparative extension developed across the field from the 1980s onward |
| 유형≠ | Qualitative multi-case analytic design | Qualitative micro-analytic research design |
| 원전 | Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. DOI ↗ | Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. DOI ↗ |
| 별칭 | multi-case CA, cross-case conversation analysis, comparative conversation analysis, multiple-instance CA | comparative CA, cross-contextual conversation analysis, comparative interactional analysis, comparative talk-in-interaction |
| 관련≠ | 5 | 3 |
| 요약≠ | Multiple case-based conversation analysis applies the fine-grained sequential methods of Conversation Analysis (CA) across two or more distinct cases — settings, groups, or interactions — to identify both case-specific patterns and cross-case regularities in naturally occurring talk. By examining how participants organise turn-taking, repair, and action sequences in multiple contexts, the approach strengthens claims about interactional phenomena beyond what a single-case study can establish. | Comparative Conversation Analysis (comparative CA) applies the rigorous micro-analytic methods of Conversation Analysis across two or more contrasting interactional settings, languages, cultures, or participant groups. It examines how the sequential organisation of talk — turn-taking, repair, adjacency pairs, and action formation — varies or remains stable across contexts, producing cross-contextual evidence about the architecture of human interaction. |
| ScholarGate데이터셋 ↗ |
|
|