방법 비교
선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.
| 다중 사례 기반 구성주의 근거 이론× | Constructivist Grounded Theory× | |
|---|---|---|
| 분야 | 질적 방법 | 질적 방법 |
| 계열 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 기원 연도≠ | 2006 (Charmaz's CGT); multi-case applications prominent from 2010s onward | 2000s (Charmaz 2000–2006; classic GT roots 1967) |
| 창시자≠ | Kathy Charmaz (constructivist grounded theory); multi-case extension developed through methodological elaboration by Charmaz and subsequent scholars | Kathy Charmaz (building on Glaser & Strauss, 1967) |
| 유형≠ | Qualitative research design and analytic approach | Qualitative research method |
| 원전 | Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. Sage. ISBN: 978-0761973522 | Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. Sage. ISBN: 978-0761973539 |
| 별칭 | multi-case CGT, constructivist grounded theory with multiple cases, multiple-site constructivist GT, CGT multiple case design | CGT, constructivist GT, Charmaz grounded theory, interpretive grounded theory |
| 관련 | 6 | 6 |
| 요약≠ | Multiple case-based constructivist grounded theory (CGT) combines Kathy Charmaz's constructivist grounded theory framework with a deliberate multi-case design. The researcher collects and analyzes data from two or more purposively selected cases simultaneously, applying iterative coding, constant comparison, and theoretical sampling across cases to build a grounded theory that accounts for both within-case depth and cross-case variation. The resulting theory is understood as jointly constructed by researcher and participants rather than objectively discovered. | Constructivist Grounded Theory (CGT) is a qualitative methodology developed by Kathy Charmaz that systematically builds mid-range theory from empirical data through iterative coding, memo-writing, and theoretical sampling. Unlike the original objectivist version by Glaser and Strauss, CGT treats both data and theory as co-constructed between researcher and participants, acknowledging the researcher's interpretive perspective as an integral part of the analytic process rather than a source of bias to be eliminated. |
| ScholarGate데이터셋 ↗ |
|
|