방법 비교
선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.
| 다집단 문항 분석× | 다집단 측정 불변성 검정× | |
|---|---|---|
| 분야 | 심리측정학 | 심리측정학 |
| 계열 | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| 기원 연도≠ | 1986 | 1971–1993 |
| 창시자≠ | Classical test theory tradition; systematised by Crocker & Algina (1986) | Jöreskog, K. G. (1971); Meredith, W. (1993) |
| 유형≠ | Comparative item-level analysis | Model comparison / hypothesis testing |
| 원전≠ | Crocker, L. & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to Classical and Modern Test Theory. Holt, Rinehart and Winston. ISBN: 978-0030616341 | Vandenberg, R. J. & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70. DOI ↗ |
| 별칭 | MGIA, group-comparative item analysis, subgroup item analysis, cross-group item analysis | measurement invariance, factorial invariance, cross-group invariance, MI testing |
| 관련 | 6 | 6 |
| 요약≠ | Multi-group item analysis computes classical item statistics — difficulty, discrimination, and corrected item-total correlations — separately for each subgroup in a sample and then compares those statistics across groups. It is a standard diagnostic step in scale development and test fairness evaluation, revealing items that behave differently for men versus women, across age cohorts, or across cultural groups before more formal DIF testing. | Multi-group measurement invariance testing examines whether a latent construct is measured in the same way across two or more distinct groups — such as cultures, genders, or age cohorts. It is a prerequisite for meaningful group comparisons of latent means or relationships, ensuring that observed score differences reflect true differences rather than measurement artifacts. |
| ScholarGate데이터셋 ↗ |
|
|