ScholarGate
어시스턴트

방법 비교

선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.

m-Polar Hesitant Fuzzy TOPSIS (Akram, Adeel & Alcantud 2019, Symmetry 11(6):795)×최선-최악법 (Best-Worst Method)×
분야의사결정의사결정
계열MCDMMCDM
기원 연도20192015
창시자Akram, M., Adeel, A., Alcantud, J. C. R.Rezaei, J.
유형Distance-based ranking — m-polar hesitant fuzzy TOPSIS — pole-wise max/min ideals on a weighted mHF decision matrix (Eqs. 1–2), mHF Euclidean distance (Eqs. 3–4), closeness coefficient E_j' (Eq. 5)Pairwise comparison (best-to-others + others-to-worst vectors), LP
원전Akram, M., Adeel, A., Alcantud, J. C. R. (2019). Multi-Criteria Group Decision-Making Using an m-Polar Hesitant Fuzzy TOPSIS Approach. Symmetry (MDPI) DOI ↗Rezaei, J. (2015). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega DOI ↗
별칭
관련38
요약MPF-HF-TOPSIS (m-Polar Hesitant Fuzzy TOPSIS (Akram, Adeel & Alcantud 2019, Symmetry 11(6):795) — multi-criteria group decision-making by extending TOPSIS to the m-polar hesitant fuzzy (mHF) set framework; pole-wise mHPIS/mHNIS extraction, mHF Euclidean distance and closeness coefficient ranking) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Akram, M., Adeel, A., Alcantud, J. C. R. in 2019. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.BWM (Best-Worst Method) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Rezaei, J. in 2015. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGate데이터셋
  1. v1
  2. 1 출처
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 출처
  3. PUBLISHED

검색으로 이동 슬라이드 다운로드

ScholarGate방법 비교: MPF-HF-TOPSIS · BWM. 2026-06-18에 다음에서 검색함: https://scholargate.app/ko/compare