방법 비교
선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.
| Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool: 연구 설계 전반의 질 평가× | GRADE 근거 프로파일링: 근거의 확실성 및 권고 강도 평가× | |
|---|---|---|
| 분야 | 연구방법론 | 연구방법론 |
| 계열 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 기원 연도≠ | 2014 (updated 2018) | 2008 |
| 창시자≠ | Pluye et al. | Guyatt et al. (GRADE Working Group) |
| 유형≠ | Research methodology evaluation | Research team / Guideline panel assessment |
| 원전≠ | Pluye, P., & Hong, Q. N. (2014). Combining the power of stories and the power of numbers: mixed methods research and mixed studies reviews. Annual Review of Public Health, 35, 29–45. DOI ↗ | Guyatt, G., Oxman, A. D., Vist, G. E., Kunz, R., Falck-Ytter, Y., Alonso-Coello, P., & Schünemann, H. J. (2008). GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ, 336(7650), 924–926. DOI ↗ |
| 별칭 | MMAT, MMAT 2018 | GRADE, GRADE approach |
| 관련 | 4 | 4 |
| 요약≠ | MMAT (Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool) is a practical, design-agnostic quality assessment tool developed by Pluye et al. (2014, updated 2018) to evaluate the methodological quality of quantitative (RCTs, non-randomized studies), qualitative, and mixed-methods studies. Unlike tools designed for single paradigms (e.g., Cochrane RoB 2 for RCTs), MMAT provides unified criteria applicable across diverse research methodologies, making it particularly useful for systematic reviews incorporating multiple study designs. | GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) is a systematic, transparent framework for assessing the certainty of evidence and determining the strength of clinical recommendations in healthcare. Published in 2008 by Guyatt et al., GRADE has become the international standard for guideline development, used by the World Health Organization, Cochrane, and most major clinical guideline organizations worldwide. |
| ScholarGate데이터셋 ↗ |
|
|